All matters listed below are fully resolved unless explicitly marked Ongoing. On appellate review, the allegations of misconduct were found unproven, and sole legal and physical custody of the child was awarded to Karl Reeves by final order, affirmed November 2024 (Matter of Karl R. v Julianne M. R., 2024 NY Slip Op 05501 [1st Dept 2024]). Family Court and matrimonial records are confidential by law and are not published here; all linked documents are public records.

Case Name & Citation Nature of Proceeding Key Outcome Decision Date & Public Link
Matter of Karl R. v Julianne M. R., 2024 NY Slip Op 05501 (1st Dept)
Parties: Karl Reeves and Julianne Michelle Reeves
Final appellate custody determination Final. Sole legal and physical custody affirmed to the father. The court, exercising its “authority to review the record and make its own credibility assessment,” found “a sound and substantial basis in the record for the court’s determination that awarding custody to the father was in the child’s best interests.” Remanded solely to set a specific visitation and access schedule and address visitation costs.
Family Court, New York County
Final Order on Petition for Visitation on Consent
Post-remand visitation and access terms Final. Resolved the visitation and cost issues remanded by the Appellate Division, concluding the primary proceedings. Visitation remains supervised.
Reeves v Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts (FCVFC) and Jill Jones-Soderman
1st Dept, Case No. 2024-07814
Appeal from denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss defamation claim Final. Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the defamation claim unanimously affirmed, without costs. Claim proceeds under anti-SLAPP standards; fair report privilege held inapplicable.
Reeves v FCVFC and Jill Jones-Soderman
Supreme Court, N.Y. County, Index No. 150731/2019
Defamation action arising from “ethics complaints” posted during custody dispute Ongoing. Defamation claim proceeding in Supreme Court following the appellate affirmance above. Full docket publicly available.
Julianne Michelle Reeves v Karl Reeves
S.D.N.Y., No. 1:22-cv-02544 (JGK) (Koeltl, J.)
Attempted removal of Family Court custody case to federal court Final. Removal rejected; motions for sanctions and a preliminary injunction denied; matter remanded to Family Court. “Under the domestic relations abstention doctrine, federal courts should not exercise jurisdiction over a dispute that is matrimonial in nature… The petitioner’s attempt to invoke bankruptcy removal is unpersuasive.”
Reeves v Reeves and Douglass, Adv. Proc. No. 23-01028 (MG)
Within In re Julianne Michelle Reeves, No. 22-10353 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Adversary proceeding in Chapter 7 bankruptcy — fraud on the court; judgment against debtor’s counsel Final. Default judgment for fraud on the court entered against the debtor’s attorney. The court found “the record establishes that Douglass committed fraud on the court,” noting the debtor’s schedules listed “total personal property” of $151,210,044.83 against petition-stated assets of $1–10 million — “Not bad for a Chapter 7 debtor!” Final judgment of $45,691.70 entered April 8, 2024; the court separately sanctioned counsel $1,000 for repeated misconduct during the damages inquest.
Matter of Joycelyn E. v Julianne R. et al., Case No. 2024-00923, Dkt. No. V-10087/23 (1st Dept)
Petitioner: Joycelyn Engle Di Palma (maternal grandmother), pro se, against Julianne Michelle Reeves and Karl Reeves, respondents
Appeal from sua sponte dismissal of grandmother’s visitation petition Final. Grandmother’s petition for visitation with the child dismissed sua sponte, with prejudice, by Family Court (Jan. 8, 2024). Appeal unanimously dismissed as taken from a nonappealable order.
Karl Reeves, C.E.I.N.Y. Corp. v Associated Newspapers, Ltd.
Supreme Court, N.Y. County, Index No. 154855/2020; 1st Dept Case No. 2021-03446
Defamation action arising from tabloid coverage (Daily Mail / Mail Media) Ongoing. Dismissal of the complaint affirmed on fair report privilege grounds; matter remanded for calculation of defendants’ attorneys’ fees under New York’s amended anti-SLAPP law. Further review is being sought in the New York Court of Appeals concerning the application of the amended statute to previously filed actions.

Related Commentary

Alan S. Lewis & Madelyn K. White, New York’s Anti-SLAPP Act: An Unnecessary Chill on the First Amendment Right to Petition, New York Law Journal (Jan. 12, 2026) — analysis of the anti-SLAPP framework relevant to the defamation matters above.